Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coalition for Christian Outreach (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 19:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coalition for Christian Outreach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable religious organization. The sources do not provide sufficient evidence of notability to demonstrate that the CCO has "gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time." Sources provided are glancing mentions. Previous AFD 10 months ago, closed as "no consensus." GrapedApe (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Was sufficiently sourced by MelanieN during the last AfD. Passes WP:GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That was not the result. The closure was "no consensus"--GrapedApe (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The coverage doesn't pass GNG - it's all trivial, routine, ultra-local, and/or otherwise not establishing notability. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While individual chapters won't generally be notable, the organization is. This is the equivalent of a fraternity such as Phi Gamma Delta. The "Best Christian Workplace" got coverage in the press. St Anselm (talk) 21:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Listed in Directory of religious organizations in the United States, with lots and lots of Google Books sources – not surprising, since they have been around for 40 years, and are active on campuses in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, West Virginia, and Washington DC. The previous AfD also pointed out the existence of news sources. -- 202.124.75.46 (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly keep -- clearly a significant organisation in the states where it operates. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.